Is Knight of Wands a yes or a no?

This card leans yes. It carries forward movement, and in a straight yes/no draw most readers take it affirmatively.

The Knight of Wands is action at full speed with the details unread.

Charismatic, impulsive, magnetic and genuinely brave, and not somebody to rely on for the long middle of anything.

Golden Dawn made him fire of fire, the most volatile figure in the entire seventy-eight. The horse is rearing, the visor is up, and he is leaning forward into it. The horse is not under full control and neither of them minds.

Yes/no readings are the most popular use of tarot and the one it is worst suited to. A seventy-eight card deck built to describe nuance is being asked for one bit of information, and most of what it knows is discarded in the process.

A more useful version of the same draw: read Knight of Wands as what shape this takes, not whether it happens. Bold, decisive movement. Passion, adventure, charging at it.

Excellent when speed matters more than precision, which is a real category of situation and one where deliberation is the expensive option. Travel and relocation are common literal readings.

As a person he is exciting to be around and the thing he is best at is starting, which is genuinely valuable and is not the same as being able to finish.

Reversed, the lean weakens or inverts. Recklessness, arrogance, burning out. Starting hard and leaving.

Or the energy blocked: frustration with no outlet, which is this figure's worst state because the volume does not reduce when the direction disappears.

The reading worth watching is the pattern rather than the instance. One abandoned venture is a decision; four is a description.